Mizan Constitution
Runtime governance for AI agent actions: Mandate, Council, Gate and Receipt.
The public tree is organized by what the customer buys or uses, while internal engines remain engines. This avoids turning every experiment into a separate SKU.
Runtime governance for AI agent actions: Mandate, Council, Gate and Receipt.
Policy, shadow pilot, governance, teams and decision/audit operations in one workspace.
Facts, evidence gaps and official-route preparation for disputes. Not individualized legal advice.
They can be exposed independently for pilots or integrations, but they belong to one architecture.
Evaluates agent role, declared purpose, delegation scope and proposed tool actions before execution.
Policy, approval, evidence, authority and replay/duplicate checks for proposed business actions.
Checks whether evidence or a cited source supports a claim. It does not certify that the source itself is true.
Routes HUMAN_REVIEW cases by risk and operational priority. Routing cannot convert a hard VETO into ALLOW.
Durable decision/action receipts and replay state across ephemeral runtime revisions.
Operational surface for monitored Mizan cloud deployments and governance controls.
These surfaces support evaluation, policy quality, benchmarking and R&D.
Inspect policy text for missing controls, contradictions and rollout risk.
Open tool ↗Compare current system vs Mizan on calibration + untouched holdout with explicit false-safe / false-block reporting.
Internal automation for repeatable evaluation runs and evidence packaging.
Security-focused policy/action evaluator feeding the broader ActionGate / Constitution control path.
Behavioral feasibility research on how warnings and decision gates affect human choices.
R&D and benchmark evidence. Not positioned as a customer-facing product.